This article showcases several, realistic, vulnerabilities associated with AES-GCM. The vulnerabilities are:
- key exchange
- nonce reuse: plaintext recovery
- nonce reuse: hash subkey recovery
- unlimited message size
- unlimited messages
A necessary step for unknown peers to securely communicate is to derive a shared secret which cannot be determined by an eavesdropper. Typically, (EC)DHE is used to accomplish this.
from cryptography.hazmat.primitives.asymmetric import x25519 sk = x25519.X25519PrivateKey.generate() pk = sk.public_key() # send pk and recieve peer pk in peer_pk dh_secret = sk.exchange(peer_pk)
However, a common mistake is directly using
dh_secret as an encryption key. Using the shared secret directly is less secure because
dh_secret is a random group element instead of a random bit-string. In other words, there is structure in the value of
dh_secret because group members have constraints (e.g., the subgroup of even integers will never have LSB set). Consequently, you will reduce the bit security of your encryption key.
To securely derive an encryption key, the shared secret should be passed to a suitable KDF.
from cryptography.hazmat.primitives import hashes from cryptography.hazmat.primitives.kdf.hkdf import HKDF ... dh_secret = sk.exchange(peer_pk) # omit a salt or use a salt to "spruce up" randomness key = HKDF(hashes.SHA256(), length=32, salt, info=b"encryption key")
A caveat here is to make sure HKDF is parameterized correctly to guarantee KDF security instead of PRF security (which is not suitable here since we do not have a uniformly random bit-string).
An Additional caveat is that vanilla (EC)DHE is insecure because it does not authenticate the parties. Instead, you should use an Authenticated Key Exchange (AKE) to protect against an active attacker.
Nonce Reuse: Plaintext Recovery
AES-GCM is (in)famously brittle with respect to its nonces. It is imperative that the nonce is never reused with the same key otherwise plaintext recovery and ciphertext forgery is possible.
from cryptography.hazmat.primitives.ciphers.aead import AESGCM key = AESGCM.generate_key(bit_length=128) cipher = AESGCM(key) note1 = b"super secret message" note2 = b"\0" * len(note1) nonce = b"\0" * 12 send(cipher.encrypt(nonce, data=note1, associated_data=None)) send(cipher.encrypt(nonce, data=note2, associated_data=None))
A passive attacker will capture the two messages over the wire.
message1 = b"\xb0\xa5(Dy\xd4\x83k\xcf\x1du\xc5pw..." message2 = b"\xc3\xd0X!\x0b\xf4\xf0\x0e\xaco\x10..." print(bytes(map(lambda x: x ^ x, zip(message1, message2))))
Which will output the message! (the trailing data is the authentication tag).
b'super secret message?\x82X\xba5\xd4\xcc\xca\xbf...'
This is due to how AES-GCM is constructed, which is AES-CTR with GCM slapped on.
The diagram does not include the GHASH components because it is irrelevant here. AES-GCM will create one-time-pad for each plaintext block by appending a 32-bit incrementing counter to the input IV, which is encrypted with AES using the secret key. Then the one-time-pad is xor-d with its associated plaintext block to encrypt it.
The critical flaw with nonce reuse is that the one-time-pads become identical:
ciphertext_a = pad ^ plaintext_a ciphertext_b = pad ^ plaintext_b # pad is cancelled out assert ciphertext_a ^ ciphertext_b == plaintext_a ^ plaintext_b
In the attack demonstrated, we used a plaintext padded with 0s to better illustrate the attack. However, in practice it is often possible to manipulate the plaintext to include known values which can leak partial messages.
An important note is this only produces the xor-d plaintexts if the nonces are identical for the blocks, including the counter.
Nonce Reuse: Hash Subkey Recovery
The previous topic showcased how nonce reuse will leak xor-d plaintexts. However, nonce reuse can allow an attacker to forge “authenticated” ciphertexts.
The GCM part of AES-GCM is Galois Counter Mode which is able to compute a hash over the ciphertext and any associated data. I will not explain how Galois fields work here. The hash is given by GHASH where:
from cryptography.hazmat.primitives.ciphers import Cipher, modes from cryptography.hazmat.primitives.ciphers.algorithms import AES def encrypt(payload: bytes) -> bytes: key = b"\x01" * 32 cryptor = Cipher(AES(key), mode=modes.ECB()).encryptor() return cryptor.update(payload) + cryptor.finalize() def poly_mult(a: int, b: int) -> int: # GF(2^128) magic z = 0 for i in range(128): z ^= ((b >> i) & 1) * a a = (a >> 1) ^ (a & 1) * (0xe1 << 120) return z def intify(string: bytes) -> list[int]: f = lambda x: int.from_bytes(x, byteorder="big") return [f(string[i:i+16]) for i in range(0, len(string), 16)] def ghash(subkey: bytes, inputs: bytes) -> int: # X^n * Cn + X^n-1 * Cn-1 + ... + X * C1 x = 0 for block in intify(inputs): x = poly_mult(x ^ block, subkey) return x def gen_auth_tag(nonce: bytes, aad: bytes, ciphertext: bytes) -> bytes: # individually pad aad and ciphertext to 16 bytes ... to_bytes = lambda l, x: x.to_bytes(l, byteorder="big") to_int = lambda x: int.from_bytes(x, byteorder="big") subkey = to_int(encrypt(b"\0" * 16)) j0 = nonce + b"\0\0\0\x01" aad_len = to_bytes(8, len(aad)) ciphertext_len = to_bytes(8, len(ciphertext)) combined = aad + ciphertext + aad_len + ciphertext_len s = ghash(subkey, combined) return to_bytes(16, s ^ to_int(encrypt(j0))) message = b"Moon is hollow?!" nonce = b"\0" * 12 pad = encrypt(nonce + b"\0\0\0\x02") ciphertext = bytes(map(lambda x: x ^ x, zip(message, pad))) gen_auth_tag(encrypt(b"\0" * 16), b"...", encrypt(b"secret message"))
This will compute a polynomial parameterized by X (the subkey) for some message.
g(X) = X^n * Cn + X^n-1 * Cn-1 + ... + X * C1 + J = T
but if X (i.e., the subkey) is repeated then:
g(X) = X^n*Cn + X^n-1*Cn-1 + ... + X*C1 + J h(X) = X^n*Dn + X^n-1*Dn-1 + ... + X*D1 + J // addition on GF(2^128) is involutive g(X) + g(X) = 0 = h(X) + h(X) // add the polynomials and the authentication tags from two messages g(X) + h(X) = X^n*(Dn + Cn) + ... + X*(D1 + C1) + g(X) + h(X) = 0
In this form, an attacker can solve the equation which produces possible values of the subkey. Once an attacker has derived the subkey, the attacker can forge ciphertexts.
Unlimited Message Size
If we have 232 plaintext blocks then the 32-bit counter will overflow which repeats the nonce for subsequent blocks.
AES has a block size of 128 bits so all nonces are 128 bits instead of 256-bit for AES-256. Therefore, after encrypting 264 messages you have a 50% probability of repeating a nonce. Furthermore, if we have a random nonce then after 248 messages we expect a 50% probability of duplication. For real usage, it is necessary to have a cut-off probability (generally 2-32).
Do not write this yourself; use an existing library to handle it all for you.
- use XChaCha20-Poly1305 (or at least AES-GCM-SIV)
- read NIST SP 800-38D